Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735987›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2022

Children included in randomised controlled trials of biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases do not represent the real-world patient mix.

Ohad Atia, Gemma Pujol-Muncunill, Víctor Manuel Navas-López, Esther Orlanski-Meyer, Oren Ledder, Raffi Lev-Tzion, Gili Focht, Eyal Shteyer, Ronen Stein, Marina Aloi and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ohad AtiaJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7800-1984
Gemma Pujol-MuncunillHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Víctor Manuel Navas-LópezHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Esther Orlanski-MeyerJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Oren LedderJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Raffi Lev-TzionJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gili FochtJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eyal ShteyerJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ronen SteinChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Marina AloiSapienza University of Rome - Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Richard K RussellThe Royal Hospital for Children & Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
Javier Martin-de-CarpiHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Dan TurnerJuliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESPoliclinico Umberto I · ITRoyal Hospital for Children · GBShaare Zedek Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients enrolled in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) may differ from the target population due to restricted eligibility criteria.

aimTo compare treatment response to biologics in routine practice for children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) who would and would not have been eligible for enrolment in the regulatory RCT of the same drug.

methodsWe enrolled children with IBD who initiated adalimumab, infliximab, vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The eligibility criteria as defined in the RCT of the corresponding biologic were applied to each patient. The primary outcome was 12-month steroid-free remission (SFR) without switching biologics or undergoing surgery.

resultsWe screened 289 children (198 [68%] with Crohn's disease [CD], 91 [32%] with ulcerative colitis [UC]) with 326 initiations of biologics. Only 62 of 164 (38%) children with moderate-to-severe disease would have been eligible for inclusion in the original RCTs. The SFR rate was higher in the eligible children (51%) than in the ineligible children (31%; OR 2.3 [95%CI 1.2-4.5]; p = 0.01). The main exclusion criterion was prohibited previous therapies (47%). Ineligible CD patients were older, more often had a family history of IBD and had higher levels of CRP than eligible children; in UC there were no differences between the groups.

conclusionMost children with IBD who initiate biologics would not have been eligible to be included in the corresponding regulatory RCTs. The outcomes of ineligible patients were worse than for eligible patients. Results from RCTs should be interpreted with caution when applied to clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesChildHumansInfliximabRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiological ProductsInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID35735987
PMCPMC9542175
OpenAlexW4283320222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.