Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735875›Full record

ArticleInsects2022

Colour Response in Western Flower Thrips Varies Intraspecifically.

Karla Lopez-Reyes, Karen F Armstrong, David A J Teulon, Ruth C Butler, Coby van Dooremalen, Monika Roher, Robert W H M van Tol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Marigold,Insects · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Colour vision in thrips (Thysanoptera).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karla Lopez-ReyesBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1469-9081
Karen F ArmstrongBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-2651
David A J TeulonNew Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-2160
Ruth C ButlerNew Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8646-1147
Coby van DooremalenBees@wur, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Monika RoherFaculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Robert W H M van TolBees@wur, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture (Topsector Tuinbouw & Uitgangsmaterialen, program number KV 1605-075) [with co-finance from Koppert Biological Systems, LTO Glastuinbouw Nederland, and Stichting Programmafonds Glastuinbouw] (The Netherlands), and the Bio-Protectio KV 1605-075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrepancies in the published research as to the attraction of the economically important pest western flower thrips (WFT) to different colours confounds the optimisation of field traps for pest management purposes. We considered whether the different experimental conditions of independent studies could have contributed to this. Therefore, the behavioural response (i.e., landings) to different colour cues of two WFT laboratory populations from Germany (DE) and The Netherlands (NL), which had previously been independently shown to have different colour preferences, were tested in the same place, and under the same experimental conditions. Single-choice wind tunnel bioassays supported previous independent findings, with more of a NL population landing on the yellow LED lamp (588 nm) than the blue (470 nm) (p = 0.022), and a not-statistically significant trend observed in a DE population landing more on blue compared to yellow (p = 0.104). To account for potential original host rearing influences, both populations were subsequently established on bean for ~20 weeks, then yellow chrysanthemum for 4−8 and 12−14 weeks and tested in wind tunnel choice bioassays. Laboratory of origin, irrespective of the host plant rearing regime, remained a significant effect (p < 0.001), with 65% of the NL WFT landing on yellow compared to blue (35%), while 66% of the DE WFT landed on blue compared to yellow (34%). There was also a significant host plant effect (p < 0.001), with increased response to yellow independent of laboratory of origin after rearing on chrysanthemum for 12−14 weeks. Results suggest that differing responses of WFT populations to colour is, in this case, independent of the experimental situation. Long-term separate isolation from the wild cannot be excluded as a cause, and the implications of this for optimising the trap colour is discussed.

Indexed as

behaviourcolour choice-testFrankliniella occidentalisthripstrappingwind tunnel

Identifiers

PMID35735875
PMCPMC9224597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.