Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735804›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022

Telemonitoring Potential of Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators during the Follow-Up of Patients with Heart Failure.

Christian Blockhaus, Jan-Erik Guelker, Ludger Feyen, Alexander Bufe, Melchior Seyfarth, Dong-In Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian BlockhausHeart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
Jan-Erik GuelkerFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany.
Ludger FeyenFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany.
Alexander BufeHeart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
Melchior SeyfarthFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, 58448 Witten, Germany.
Dong-In ShinHeart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) are a well-established tool to bridge the recovery time of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) until the implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), as recommended by the current guidelines. Besides their function to detect and treat malignant arrhythmias, WCDs may be used as a telemonitoring system. In this study, we sought to illustrate and discuss the telemonitoring potential of WCDs and to analyze physical activity in specific patient cohorts. METHODS AND

resultsWe retrospectively included 140 patients with reduced LVEF who were prescribed WCDs in our clinic. We analyzed the patients' physical activity (

conclusionWCDs may be used as a telemonitoring and intervention tool in patients with reduced LVEF. Specific patient groups may benefit from guidance from their treating physician regarding physical activity.

Indexed as

heart failure unitphysical activitysudden cardiac deathtelemonitoringwearable cardioverter defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID35735804
PMCPMC9224944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.