Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735740›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2022

How to Select a Graduate School Program for a PhD in Biomedical Science.

Carly L Lancaster, Lauryn Higginson, Brandon Chen, Lucas Encarnacion-Rivera, Derrick J Morton, Anita H Corbett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carly L LancasterDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lauryn HigginsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Brandon ChenDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lucas Encarnacion-RiveraDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Derrick J MortonGraduate Program in Biochemistry, Cell, and Developmental Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anita H CorbettDepartment of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Training Program in Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular BiologyT32GM135060 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Lawrence H. Boise, ANITA H. CORBETT · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Emory Initiative to Maximize Student DevelopmentR25GM125598 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETT, ANITA H., MARSTELLER, PATRICIA A. · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Neurodevelopmental Role of an RNA Binding Protein Required for Cognitive FunctionR01MH107305 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETT, ANITA H., MOBERG, KENNETH H · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
A Conserved RNA Binding Protein Required for Control of Key Developmental PathwaysR01NS125768 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ANITA H. CORBETT, Kenneth H Moberg · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Insight Into The RNA Processing And Decay Pathways Critical For Proper Neuronal Development And Function Through Focus On Mutations That Cause Pontocerebellar HypoplasiaR01GM130147 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CORBETT, ANITA H., VAN HOOF, AMBRO · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
A Conserved RNA Binding Protein Regulates RNAs Critical for NeurodevelopmentF31NS127545 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LANCASTER, CARLY L · 2022 to 2024
$143k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130147NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM125598NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135060NIH HHS F31NS127545NIH HHS R01NS125768NIH HHS R25GM125598NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107305NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS127545NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this article is to provide guidance for those who have decided to apply to graduate school with the plan to obtain a PhD in biomedical science. Choosing an appropriate graduate school and program can seem like a daunting choice. There are numerous graduate training programs that offer excellent training with multiple specific program choices at any given institution. Thus, identifying a program that provides an optimal training environment, which aligns with the applicant's training and career goals, can be daunting. There is no single training program that is ideal for all applicants, and, fortunately, there is no sole perfect place for any individual applicant to obtain a PhD. This article presents points to consider at multiple phases of this process as collected from the authors, including a senior faculty member, a junior faculty member, and four current graduate students who all made different choices for their graduate training (Fig. 1). In Phase I of the process, the vast number of choices must be culled to a reasonable number of schools/programs for the initial application. This is one of the most challenging steps because the number of training programs is very large, and most applicants will rely primarily on information readily available on the internet. Phase II is the exciting stage of visiting the program for an interview where you can ask questions and get a feel for the place. Finally, Phase III suggests information to collect following the interview when comparing choices and making a final decision. While the process may feel long and can be stressful, the good news is that making informed decisions along the way should result in multiple options that can support excellent training and career development. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

Education, GraduateSchoolsFacultyHumansMotivationStudentsconsiderationsdecisionsgraduate programgraduate schoolPhDSTEM

Identifiers

PMID35735740
PMCPMC9245324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.