Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735499›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Comparison of Computer-Aided Diagnosis Schemes Optimized Using Radiomics and Deep Transfer Learning Methods.

Gopichandh Danala, Sai Kiran Maryada, Warid Islam, Rowzat Faiz, Meredith Jones, Yuchen Qiu, Bin Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Survey on Physiological Signal-Based Emotion Recognition.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gopichandh DanalaSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6857-9408
Sai Kiran MaryadaSchool of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Warid IslamSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Rowzat FaizSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Meredith JonesStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Yuchen QiuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Bin ZhengSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7682-6648

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Wade Williams · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Use of 3D Quantitative Optical Methods to Optimize Mebendazole Treatment of Ovarian CancerP20GM135009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI Yuye Ling · 2022 to 2026
$13.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM135009NIH HHS P20 GM135009NIH HHS P30 CA225520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Radiomics and deep transfer learning are two popular technologies used to develop computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) schemes of medical images. This study aims to investigate and to compare the advantages and the potential limitations of applying these two technologies in developing CAD schemes. Methods: A relatively large and diverse retrospective dataset including 3000 digital mammograms was assembled in which 1496 images depicted malignant lesions and 1504 images depicted benign lesions. Two CAD schemes were developed to classify breast lesions. The first scheme was developed using four steps namely, applying an adaptive multi-layer topographic region growing algorithm to segment lesions, computing initial radiomics features, applying a principal component algorithm to generate an optimal feature vector, and building a support vector machine classifier. The second CAD scheme was built based on a pre-trained residual net architecture (ResNet50) as a transfer learning model to classify breast lesions. Both CAD schemes were trained and tested using a 10-fold cross-validation method. Several score fusion methods were also investigated to classify breast lesions. CAD performances were evaluated and compared by the areas under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: The ResNet50 model-based CAD scheme yielded AUC = 0.85 ± 0.02, which was significantly higher than the radiomics feature-based CAD scheme with AUC = 0.77 ± 0.02 (p < 0.01). Additionally, the fusion of classification scores generated by the two CAD schemes did not further improve classification performance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that using deep transfer learning is more efficient to develop CAD schemes and it enables a higher lesion classification performance than CAD schemes developed using radiomics-based technology.

Indexed as

assessment of CAD performancebreast lesion classificationcomputer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemesdeep transfer learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35735499
PMCPMC9219621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.