Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735418›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Telemedicine in Cancer Care in Saskatchewan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hurria Gondal, Tahir Abbas, Heather Choquette, Duc Le, Haji Ibraheem Chalchal, Nayyer Iqbal, Shahid Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Impact of Travel Distance on Cancer Stage at Diagnosis for Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hurria GondalDivision of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N5E5, Canada.
Tahir AbbasSaskatchewan Cancer Agency-Saskatoon Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N4H4, Canada.
Heather ChoquetteCommunity Oncology Service, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina, SK S4T7T1, Canada.
Duc LeSaskatchewan Cancer Agency-Saskatoon Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N4H4, Canada.
Haji Ibraheem ChalchalSaskatchewan Cancer Agency-Allan Blair Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, SK S4T7T1, Canada.
Nayyer IqbalSaskatchewan Cancer Agency-Saskatoon Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N4H4, Canada.
Shahid AhmedSaskatchewan Cancer Agency-Saskatoon Cancer Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N4H4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2099-698X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine is a useful tool that connects patients to their care team remotely and improves access to medical care for rural residents. This study aimed to determine the telemedicine experience of both rural patients with cancer and their physicians, and to explore factors associated with a positive patient experience. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, cancer patients and physicians in Saskatchewan completed a paper-based survey composed of 32 items or an electronic survey of 18 items, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess patient satisfaction in relation to various sociodemographic and cancer-related factors. Results: Overall, 25 physicians and 165 patients participated in the study. Among the physicians, 94% were confident in their telemedicine assessment, 58% agreed that telemedicine improved clinical efficiency, and 73% agreed that doctor−patient rapport was unimpaired with telemedicine. Of 165 patients, 61% had used telemedicine for the first time, 81% felt that their needs were met, 83% were satisfied with the quality of their care, and 88% had a positive experience. Overall, 83% patients vs. 45% physicians preferred telemedicine to a face-to-face clinic visit (p = 0.005). On univariate analysis, patients ≥ 65 years old had a greater positive telemedicine experience compared to patients < 65 years old (odds ratio 4.1 [1.2−13.8], p = 0.02). Conclusion: Both patients and physicians have a high rate of positive experiences with telemedicine. However, patients have a higher preference for telemedicine over face-to-face visits compared to physicians. In addition, elderly patients have more positive telemedicine experiences compared to younger patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansTelemedicineAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionSaskatchewancancer carepatient satisfactionrural residencetelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35735418
PMCPMC9221857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.