Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735417›Full record

Trial reportCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Willingness to Self-Collect a Sample for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in a Well-Screened Cohort: HPV FOCAL Survey Results.

Anne Lesack, Laurie W Smith, C Sarai Racey, Lovedeep Gondara, Mel Krajden, Marette Lee, Ruth Elwood Martin, Gavin Stuart, Stuart Peacock, Eduardo L Franco and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne LesackFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Laurie W SmithCancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
C Sarai RaceyFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Lovedeep GondaraCancer Surveillance and Outcomes, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Mel KrajdenFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Marette LeeFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Ruth Elwood MartinFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Gavin StuartFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8815-4607
Stuart PeacockCancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8243-8721
Eduardo L FrancoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-8084
Dirk van NiekerkFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Gina S OgilvieFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Cancer Agency · CAMcGill University · CASimon Fraser University · CAWomen's Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

CIHR MCT-82072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-collection may provide an opportunity for innovation within population-based human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening programs by providing an alternative form of engagement for all individuals. The primary objective was to determine willingness to self-collect a vaginal sample for primary HPV screening and factors that impact willingness in individuals who participated in the Human Papillomavirus For Cervical Cancer (HPV FOCAL) screening trial, a large randomized controlled cervical screening trial. A cross-sectional online survey was distributed between 2017 and 2018 to 13,176 eligible participants exiting the FOCAL trial. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression assessed factors that influence willingness to self-collect on 4945 respondents. Overall, 52.1% of respondents indicated willingness to self-collect an HPV sample. In multivariable analysis, the odds of willingness to self-collect were significantly higher in participants who agreed that screening with an HPV test instead of a Pap test was acceptable to them (odds ratio (OR): 1.45 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15, 1.82), those who indicated that collecting their own HPV sample was acceptable to them (p < 0.001), and those with higher educational ascertainment (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.54). The findings offer insight into the intentions to self-collect in those already engaged in screening, and can inform cervical cancer screening programs interested in offering alternative approaches to HPV-based screening.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaeSurveys and Questionnairesattitudes and acceptance HPV self-samplingHPVHPV self-samplingHPV testing for cervix screeninghuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID35735417
PMCPMC9221715
OpenAlexW4281553388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.