Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735414›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Patient Perceived Financial Burden in Haematological Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

Catriona Parker, Danielle Berkovic, Darshini Ayton, Ella Zomer, Danny Liew, Andrew Wei

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The perceptions of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decision-making in patients with hematologic malignancies: a qualitative systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catriona ParkerSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-3075
Danielle BerkovicSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Darshini AytonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Ella ZomerSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Danny LiewSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Andrew WeiDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Health, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Monash University · AUAlfred Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in scientific understanding have led to novel therapies and improved supportive care for many patients with haematological malignancies. However, these new drugs are often costly, only available at centralised health care facilities, require regular specialist reviews and lengthy treatment regimens. This leads to a significant financial burden. Understanding the impact of financial burden on haematological patients is important to appreciate the urgency of alleviating this systemic issue.

methodEligible studies were identified by systematically searching Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Embase. Self-reported data reported in both quantitative and qualitative studies that described the financial burden for patients with haematological malignancies were included. Quality appraisal of the included studies was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. A narrative synthesis was employed. For quantitative studies, outcomes were extracted, tabulated and categorised to find similarities and differences between the studies. For qualitative studies, quotations, codes and themes were extracted and then clustered. An inductive approach derived qualitative themes.

resultsTwenty studies were identified for inclusion. Of the quantitative studies most (83%) employed un-validated researcher-generated measures to assess financial burden. Between 15-59% of patients experienced a financial burden. Out-of-pocket expenditure was frequent for clinical appointments, prescription and non-prescription medication, and travel. Financial burden was associated with a worsening quality of life and living in metropolitan areas, but there was no evidence for impact on survival. Patient-centred experiences from the qualitative inquiry complemented the quantitative findings and five themes were determined: familial or household impact; reliance on others; barriers to care due to cost; and barriers to accessing financial assistance and sources of out-of-pocket expenses.

conclusionThe impacts of financial burden are yet to be fully appreciated in haematological malignancies, exacerbated by the heterogeneous methods employed by researchers. Future work should focus on identifying the long-term ramifications of financial burden for patients and should trial interventions to reduce its prevalence and patient impacts.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeFinancial StressHumansQualitative Researcheconomicfinancial burdenhaematologyleukaemialymphomamultiple myelomasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35735414
PMCPMC9221876
OpenAlexW4281566641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.