Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735357›Full record

ArticleAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Kinetics of the Neutralizing and Spike SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies following the Sinovac Inactivated Virus Vaccine Compared to the Pfizer mRNA Vaccine in Singapore.

Chin Shern Lau, May Lin Helen Oh, Soon Kieng Phua, Ya Li Liang, Yanfeng Li, Jianxin Huo, Yuhan Huang, Biyan Zhang, Shengli Xu, Tar Choon Aw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chin Shern LauDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
May Lin Helen OhDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Soon Kieng PhuaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Ya Li LiangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.
Yanfeng LiGenScript Biotech (Singapore) Pte Ltd., Singapore 349248, Singapore.
Jianxin HuoSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2913-6537
Yuhan HuangSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
Biyan ZhangSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
Shengli XuSingapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore 138648, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2541-3608
Tar Choon AwDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-8836
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGChangi General Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe compared the early total spike antibody (S-Ab) and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses to two vaccines.

methodsWe studied 96 Pfizer and 34 Sinovac vaccinees over a 14-month period from January 2021 to February 2022. All vaccinees received three doses of one type of vaccine. Antibody levels (Roche Elecsys total S-Ab and the Snibe N-Ab) were tested 10 days after the first dose, 20 days after the second dose, and 20 days after the booster dose.

resultsAt all time points, the mRNA vaccine generated higher S-Ab and N-Ab responses than the inactivated virus vaccine (S-Ab: first dose 2.48 vs. 0.4 BAU/mL, second dose 2174 vs. 98 BAU/mL, third dose 15,004 vs. 525 BAU/mL; N-Ab: first dose 0.05 vs. 0.02 µg/mL, second dose 3.48 vs. 0.38 µg/mL, third dose 19.8 vs. 0.89 µg/mL). mRNA vaccine recipients had a 6.2/22.2/28.6-fold higher S-Ab and 2.5/9.2/22.2-fold higher N-Ab response than inactivated virus vaccine recipients after the first/second/third inoculations, respectively. Mann-Whitney U analysis confirmed the significant difference in S-Ab and N-Ab titers between vaccination groups at each time point.

conclusionsThe mRNA vaccines generated a more robust S-Ab and N-Ab response than the inactivated virus vaccine at all time points after the first, second, and third vaccinations.

Indexed as

antibodiesinactivated virus vaccinemRNA vaccineSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35735357
PMCPMC9220327
OpenAlexW4282049479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.