Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35735251›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiac surgery2022

To repair or replace-the root dilemma in aortic dissections.

Pradeep Narayan, Gianni D Angelini

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pradeep NarayanRabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Narayana Health, Kolkata, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-1338
Gianni D AngeliniBristol Heart Institute, Bristol University, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-3730
Narayana Health · INNIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant dilemma exists regarding the management of the aortic root pathology in acute aortic dissections. Several strategies for both repair and replacement exist and there is a lack of clarity on the superiority of one over the other. Important factors that influence management strategies include involvement of the sinuses, the competence of the aortic valve, the presence of Marfans syndrome, and connective tissue disorders, as well as availability of surgical expertise. The wide variability in these factors makes it unlikely for any one technique to be suitable for the management of all aortic roots pathology.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortaAortic ValveHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeaortic dissectionlimited root repairroot replacement

Identifiers

PMID35735251
PMCPMC9540580
OpenAlexW4283318147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.