ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2022
Diagnostic Value of Microarray Method in Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability, and Multiple Congenital Anomalies and Some Candidate Genes for Autism: Experience of Two Centers.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic architecture of patients with autism spectrum disorder - data analysis based on the literature review.BMC medical genomics · 2026Review
- Diversity of molecular karyotypes of 234 pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder in chromosomal microarray analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the diagnostic value of microarray testing in autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and multiple congenital anomalies of unknown etiology, as well as to report some potential candidate genes for autism. Methods: Microarray analysis records between January 2016 and December 2017 from two Genetic Diagnostic Centers in Turkey, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman and Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, were compiled. Detected copy number variations (CNVs) were classified as benign, likely benign, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. The clinical findings of the some patients and the literature data were compared. Results: In 109 (24.5%) of 445 patients, a total of 163 CNVs with reporting criterion feature were detected. Sixty-nine (42%) and 8 (5%) of these were evaluated as pathogenic and likely pathogenic, respectively. Fifteen (9%) CNVs were also evaluated as VUS. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs were detected in 61 (13.6%) of 445 patients. Conclusions: We found that the probability of elucidating the etiology of microarray method in autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and multiple congenital anomalies is 13.6% with a percentage similar to the literature. We suggest that the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.