ReviewJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2022
Global trends of dalbavancin: A bibliometric analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Data Regarding Dalbavancin Use before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bibliometric insights into the most influential papers on antibiotic adjuvants: a comprehensive analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Global trends of dalbavancin: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2022Review
- Novel dalbavancin-PLLA implant coating prevents hematogenousFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE?: Dalbavancin is used against gram-positive pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus in acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.
methodsOur main goal was to identify the key articles sustaining the current knowledge of this drug's therapeutic possibilities through a bibliometric analysis of the available literature. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: On 15 March 2021, we searched the Web of Science electronically for documents that contain within its title the term "dalbavancin." We found a total of 675 documents that average 20.23 citations/publication with a density of 682.60 citations per/year, yielding an h-index of 58. After ranking them by the number of times cited, we extracted the top 100 most-cited records (T100). Number of citations/publication ranged from 13 to 231, publication years were 2002-2019, with the top-cited article published in 2014. All T100 publications were written in English. JMI Laboratories was the institution with the most articles in the T100 (22 documents), and the United States was the top country (75 documents). Five authors participated in at least five of the T100, led by Jones RN with 20 articles. Positions #1, #2, #5, and #9 were clinical trials for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), the on-label indication for dalbavancin. Only one article in the top 10 (T10) was an off-label indication that was published in 2005 with 186 citations, and occupied the third position among the T100. Using the VOSviewer© programme, we observed that the most used keywords were: dalbavancin, lipoglycopeptide, gram-positive, osteomyelitis, vancomycin, and MRSA. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS?: Our study identifies the most significant research on dalbavancin, including the highest impact publications, and highlights the recent trend of dalbavancin in new therapies. The T10 articles include the most important dalbavancin clinical trials, along with other studies and reviews that support the growing role of this antibiotic in clinical use. Emphasis has been on the favourable pharmacokinetic profile that allows administration once-weekly, with minimal risk of severe adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.