Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734824›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Precision medicine versus standard of care for patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): rationale and design of the multicentre, randomised PROMISE trial.

Rocco Antonio Montone, Nicola Cosentino, Francesca Graziani, Riccardo Gorla, Marco Giuseppe Del Buono, Giulia La Vecchia, Riccardo Rinaldi, Giancarlo Marenzi, Antonio L Bartorelli, Federico De Marco and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT05122780. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05122780 phase4unknown status

PROgnostic Value of Precision Medicine in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Non-obStructive Coronary artEries: the PROMISE Trial.

Ran2021Enrolled120Registered outcomes17Posted comparisons0ConditionsMyocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary ArteriesArmsACEi/ARB, Acetylcholine provocative test, Anticoagulant, Antiplatelet Drug, Beta Blocker
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Device-Based Therapies for Refractory Angina.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Precision Medicine in Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rocco Antonio MontoneDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Nicola CosentinoCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Francesca GrazianiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo GorlaCardiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Marco Giuseppe Del BuonoDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Giulia La VecchiaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo RinaldiDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo MarenziCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Antonio L BartorelliCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Federico De MarcoCardiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Luca TestaCardiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BedogniCardiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Carlo TraniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna LiuzzoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giampaolo NiccoliDepartment of Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Filippo CreaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITCentro Cardiologico Monzino · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents about 6-8% of patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI), and it is associated with a significant risk of mortality, rehospitalisation, and angina burden, with high associated socioeconomic costs. It is important to note that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for MINOCA. However, to date, there are few prospective clinical trials on MINOCA and the treatment of these patients is still not defined, most likely because of the multiple underlying pathogenic mechanisms. The PROMISE trial is a randomised, multicentre, prospective, superiority, phase IV trial that will include 180 MINOCA patients randomised 1:1 to a "precision-medicine approach", consisting of a comprehensive diagnostic workup and pharmacological treatment specific for the underlying cause, versus a "standard of care" approach, consisting of routine diagnostic workup and standard medical treatment for acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the "precision-medicine approach" will improve the angina status, evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score, at 12 months (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints include the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 12-month follow-up, the related primary and secondary healthcare costs, and the ability of cardiac magnetic resonance to evaluate the different mechanisms of MINOCA. Of importance, the results derived from this trial may pave the way for a new pathophysiology-driven approach with cause-target therapies personalised for the mechanisms of MINOCA (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05122780).

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMINOCAMulticenter Studies as TopicPrecision MedicineProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35734824
PMCPMC9743237
OpenAlexW4283360126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.