ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
A 30 mm sized gastrojejunostomy may lead to a lower rate of therapy failure in comparison to a 45 mm sized gastrojejunostomy following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the Procedure: Revisiting the Technical Determinants of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
- Counting Limb Length Ratios in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Demonstration of Safety and Feasibility Using a 25-Patient Case Series in a High-Volume Academic Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In bariatric surgery the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been proven to be a safe and effective approach. Currently the optimal size of the linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and its impact on weight loss are not known due to a lack of clinical trials on that topic. We aimed to provide evidence on the impact of the GJ size in terms of gastric bypass weight loss. Methods: Patients who underwent LRYGB due to morbid obesity were retrospectively analyzed from January 2013 to January 2016. While the procedure was completely standardized, one surgeon continued using the 45 mm sized linear stapler to perform GJ while the other switched to using a 30 mm cartridge. Results: 277 patients were female (78%) and 77 males. The average age was 41.7 ± 12.3 years. In 118 cases a 30 mm sized GJ was conducted. 236 individuals received a 45 mm sized GJ. In terms of gender, age, length of biliary and alimentary limb both groups were homogenous. Individuals with a 30 mm sized GJ had a statistical significant lower rate of therapy failure (Excess weight loss <25%, 25-49%, ≥50% after 3 years, P value χ Conclusions: A 30 mm sized GJ may lead to a lower rate of therapy failure in comparison to a 45 mm sized GJ following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Prospective trials are mandatory to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.