ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Comparison of hemodynamic changes and fetal outcome between normotensive and preeclamptic parturient undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: A prospective observational cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemodynamic Changes During Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia in Normotensive and Hypertensive Pregnant Women-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dissecting Vasopressor Efficacy in the Management of Maternal Hypotension in Preeclamptic Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025Article
- Incidence and risk factors of hypotension in cesarean section patients under spinal anesthesia at a referral hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Comparison of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and norepinephrine for the prevention and treatment of spinal-induced hypotension in pre-eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maternal hypotension is a common problem during spinal anesthesia resulting in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. According to theoretical knowledge, it is more common in severe preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Objective: To compare fetomother outcome in normotensive and severe preeclamptic parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methodology: A prospective cohort study was conducted from Novembers to May 30, 2019 on 84 ASA II and III pregnant mothers. After preloading with 500 ml-1000ml crystalloids, a 0.5%isobaric bupivacaine of 10 mg-12.5 mg was administered for spinal anesthesia.Vital signs (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were recorded every 3 min till 30 min, every 5 min then after. Neonatal Apgar scores at one and 5 min after birth and intraoperative fluids consumption were recorded. Data distribution was checked by Shapiro walk's test. Chi-square test was used to calculate the incidence of hypotension between groups; both paired and unpaired t-tests were also used to calculate the percent fall in blood pressure and heart rate from baselines of each group and intergroup respectively, and P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistical significance. Results: The incidence of hypotension (over a period of 30 min after spinal anesthesia) in the preeclamptic patients (31%) was less than that of the healthy parturients (59.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in heart rate of both groups before and after induction of spinal anesthesia. The 5th minute Apgar score recordings were also comparable between the groups. Conclusion: This study showed that the incidence and magnitude of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was less in severely preeclamptic parturient than healthy parturient who underwent elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia and fetal outcome was comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.