Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734725›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Recurrent spinal stenoses after implant removal: A case report.

Singkat Dohar Al Tobing, Aryo Winartomo

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Singkat Dohar Al TobingDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Indonesia.
Aryo WinartomoDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Indonesia.
Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Cervical spinal stenoses is becoming more and more common due to the aging population. The degenerative changes in the spine including discopathy or spondylosis will constrict and narrow the spinal canal and the usual site for the stenoses is in the cervical and lumbar region. The mainstay of the treatment is surgical, however there still a controversy regarding which approach is the best for the patient with cervical stenoses. Case presentation: In this case reports we present a case of 63-year-old male who came to our center due to weakness of arms and legs due to cervical spinal stenoses and underwent treatment after which the implant was removed, and the symptoms worsens. Clinical discussion: We performed Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and insertion of a cages to stabilize the spine. ACDF associated with lower intraoperative blood loss, similar surgical duration, and complication rate compared with laminoplasty. From the radiological outcome, ACDF showed a better-preserved cervical lordosis, which could affects patient's quality of life. Conclusion: ACDF is one of the viable methods for the treatment of the cervical stenoses with lower complication rate and good clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)Cage removalCase reportCervical spinal stenosesNeurapraxia

Identifiers

PMID35734725
PMCPMC9206926
OpenAlexW4229022279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.