ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Management of midline ventral hernias in a surgical department of sub-Saharan Africa: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Anatomy of the Human Linea Alba: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Abdominal wall hernia management in a second level hospital of Senegal: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The linea alba is the second most frequent site of abdominal wall hernias after the inguinal region. Prosthetic approach, often recommended, comes up against the low socio-economic level and the availability of these materials in developing countries. Our objective is to evaluate the indications and results of midline ventral hernia surgery. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study over 36 months including all adult patients (over 15 years old) treated for primary or recurrent midline ventral hernias. The parameters studied were: age, sex, risk factors, type of hernia according to the classification of the European Hernia Society (EHS), clinical presentation, hernial ring size, surgical technique and results (recurrence, chronic pain). Results: We included 65 patients. The mean age was 40.5 years ± 16.4. There was a female predominance (56.3%, n = 36) with a sex ratio of 0.77. According to the EHS classification, type M3 (umbilical) was more common (67.2%), followed by type M2 (epigastric) in 25% and M4 (infra-umbilical) in 1.6%. According to the clinical presentation, 85.6% (n = 55) were uncomplicated, 10.9% (n = 7) were strangulated in and 3.1% (n = 2) incarcerated. A primary suture was performed in 93.8% (n = 61) and a mesh repair in 6.15% (n = 4). With a mean follow-up of 8.2 ± 11.9 months, we noted a recurrence in 6.1% (n = 4) and chronic pain in 6.1% (n = 4). Conclusion: There is a need to individualize or contextualize the guidelines. In our context where meshes are not always available, pure tissue repairs keep their place in the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.