ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Radiomic Signatures for Predicting Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saliency-Curated Deep Learning for Predicting Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- ADC Histogram Features of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases as Candidate Imaging Biomarkers of Primary Tumor ER, PR, Ki-67, and Luminal Status.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable ensemble model for predicting androgen receptor status in triple-negative breast cancer: a multi-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- An Integrated Dataset of Metastatic Breast Cancer to the Brain with Imaging, Radiomics, and Tumor Genetics.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Decoding the mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis: paving the way for precision therapeutics.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Molecular testing and targeting for solid tumors with CNS metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Diagnostics and Screening in Breast Cancer with Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2024Review
- A Radiomics-Based Model for Potentially More Accurate Identification of Subtypes of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.Yonsei medical journal · 2023Article
- Molecular signaling network and therapeutic developments in breast cancer brain metastasis.Advances in cancer biology - metastasis · 2023Article
- Characterization of Breast Tumors from MR Images Using Radiomics and Machine Learning Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds: A significant proportion of breast cancer patients showed receptor discordance between primary cancers and breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), which significantly affected therapeutic decision-making. But it was not always feasible to obtain BCBM tissues. The aim of the present study was to analyze the receptor status of primary breast cancer and matched brain metastases and establish radiomic signatures to predict the receptor status of BCBM. Methods: The receptor status of 80 matched primary breast cancers and resected brain metastases were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomic features were extracted using preoperative brain MRI (contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and combinations of these sequences) collected from 68 patients (45 and 23 for training and test sets, respectively) with BCBM excision. Using least absolute shrinkage selection operator and logistic regression model, the machine learning-based radiomic signatures were constructed to predict the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status of BCBM. Results: Discordance between the primary cancer and BCBM was found in 51.3% of patients, with 27.5%, 27.5%, and 5.0% discordance for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Loss of receptor expression was more common (33.8%) than gain (18.8%). The radiomic signatures built using combination sequences had the best performance in the training and test sets. The combination model yielded AUCs of 0.89, 0.88, and 0.87, classification sensitivities of 71.4%, 90%, and 87.5%, specificities of 81.2%, 76.9%, and 71.4%, and accuracies of 78.3%, 82.6%, and 82.6% for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively, in the test set. Conclusions: Receptor conversion in BCBM was common, and radiomic signatures show potential for noninvasively predicting BCBM receptor status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.