ArticleCJC open2022
Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Ischemic Stroke: Evaluation of the Contemporary 2018 National Inpatient Sample Database.
Article in CJC open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world evidence comparing oral anticoagulants for NVAF in Europe: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Future cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Resource utilization and inpatient hospitalization costs associated with thromboembolic events among patients with polycythemia vera.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Continuous positive airway pressure in acute ischemic stroke patients with obstructive sleep apnea: analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is considered a binary entity regardless of AF type. We aim to investigate in-hospital morbidity and mortality among patients with nonparoxysmal AF-related AIS. Methods: Patients hospitalized for AIS with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF were identified from the 2018 national inpatient sample database. We compared in-hospital mortality, stroke-related morbidity, hospital cost, length of stay, and discharge disposition in patients hospitalized with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Results: A total of 26,470 patients were hospitalized for AIS with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Patient with AIS with persistent AF had a longer hospital length of stay (paroxysmal AF, mean [M] 5.7 days, standard deviation [SD] ±6.8 days; persistent AF, M 7.4 days, SD ±11.9 days, Conclusions: Persistent AF is associated with poor in-hospital stroke-related outcome, possibly due to a worse thrombo-embolic phenomenon. AF pattern may be a harbinger of worse stroke-related morbidity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.