Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734509›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Treatment of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation by Intervertebral Foramen Remolding: A Retrospective Study.

Ao-Lin Yuan, Xin Shen, Bin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical techniques and perioperative surgical outcomes after discectomy for calcified lumbar disc herniation: a review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ao-Lin YuanMinimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Chengde Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Chengde, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-6595
Xin ShenBreast and Thyroid Surgical Oncology, Hebei Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6825-036X
Bin ChenMinimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Chengde Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Chengde, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-7166
Chengde Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the use of the percutaneous intervertebral foramen lens technology for secondary molding of the intervertebral foramen in the treatment of calcified lumbar discs. Methods: The study included 104 patients who were divided into two groups. Group A comprised 50 patients with calcified lumbar disc herniation and group B comprised 54 patients with non-calcified lumbar disc herniation diagnosed by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Patients underwent a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy at our hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Demographic characteristics before the surgery and perioperative outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment outcome was analyzed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and modified Macnab criteria. Results: Patients in groups A and B showed significant improvement in both the NRS and ODI scores after the surgery and maintained relatively low ODI and NRS scores during subsequent follow-ups. According to the evaluation under the modified MacNab standard, the good-excellent rate of clinical efficacy was 94% in group A and 92.6% in group B at the 3 month follow-up. In group A, one patient developed neck pain during the surgery, which was diagnosed as spinal hypertension syndrome, and the surgery was suspended until the patient's condition improved. No similar complications occurred in group B. In both the groups, no patient reported any dural leak, infection, or other related complications. Conclusion: The use of transforaminal remolding technology can significantly improve the symptoms and dysfunction of patients with calcified and non calcified lumbar disc herniation. There are few intraoperative and postoperative complications and have little impact on vertebral stability. It can provide a reference for the treatment of special types of lumbar disc herniation.

Indexed as

calcificationdisability indexlumbar disc herniationMacnab criterianerve root compressionOswestrypercutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgeryvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID35734509
PMCPMC9208632
OpenAlexW4283020343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.