ArticleActa clinica Croatica2021
TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES AND PROCEDURAL COMPLICATIONS IN CLOSING MALIGNANT ESOPHAGEAL-RESPIRATORY FISTULAS.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiologic Insertion of a Covered Esophageal Stent Using the Rendezvous Technique: A Case Report.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to outline technical difficulties and procedural complications of using partially covered esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) in malignant esophageal respiratory fistulas (ERFs) as a palliative treatment option. In this study, 150 patients with malignant dysphagia underwent treatment with SEMSs. A total of 36 ERFs were detected through endoscopic or clinical assessment. Complete fistula sealing with SEMSs was possible in 35 of the 36 patients. The majority of fistulas were diagnosed in male patients with advanced esophageal cancer. All of them presented with prolonged dysphagia and cachexia. Stent migration or tumoral overgrowth was identified in 6 cases with recurrent dysphagia, and required a second stent insertion. SEMSs were highly efficient in 98% of the patients studied with ERFs, with successfully sealed ERFs after the first attempt, with an overall median survival rate of 92 days. The technique of esophageal SEMS placement is simple and can be rapidly mastered. Patients with ERFs have a respiratory shunt that makes intubation difficult and is often avoided. Restoring oral feeding increased the patient quality of life. SEMS placement is generally safe, but has few associated postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.