Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734313›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022

The promise, problems, and pitfalls of including pregnant women in clinical trials of Lassa fever vaccine: a qualitative assessment of sub-Sahara Africa investigators' perception.

Kolawole Akeem Salami, Henshaw Eyambe Mandi, Nathalie Imbault, Nadia Gabriela Tornieporth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kolawole Akeem SalamiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Henshaw Eyambe MandiCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations, Oslo, Norway.
Nathalie ImbaultCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations, London, United Kingdom.
Nadia Gabriela TornieporthCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations, London, United Kingdom.
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations · NOWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lassa fever runs a uniquely severe course in pregnancy. There are plans for Lassa fever vaccine clinical trials in endemic West African countries. We assessed the perception of West African investigators to include pregnant women in these studies. Methods: interviews were conducted with eight sub-Saharan African investigators. These investigators, listed as speakers at the 9 Results: we interviewed eight (six in-person and two on the phone) out of fifteen earmarked investigators. Respondents had limited experience with pregnant women in clinical trials, but desired a paradigm shift. They identified pregnant women's willingness, a robust community engagement strategy, and adequate safety data as enablers, while lack of safety data, persistent fears about potential harm to pregnant women and offspring, and inappropriate community engagement activities as potential barriers. Conclusion: the inclusion of pregnant women in Lassa fever vaccine clinical trials should be a priority of vaccine developers. Investigators are willing to conduct these studies provided adequate measures to ensure safety is in place.

Indexed as

Lassa FeverViral VaccinesAfrica South of the SaharaClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansPerceptionPregnancyPregnant PeopleViral Vaccinesclinical trialLassa feverpregnancyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35734313
PMCPMC9187998
OpenAlexW4285741069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.