ArticleHeart rhythm O22022
Evaluation of linear lesion formation and thermodynamics by dragging ablation with the third-generation laser balloon.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous RAPID-mode ablation with a third-generation laser balloon.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The lesion formation properties of a motorized rotational delivery (RAPID) mode, third-generation laser balloon (LB3) ablation compared to point-by-point laser ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation remain unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess lesion characteristics and thermodynamics in LB3 ablation with a RAPID mode Methods: Chicken muscles were cauterized using LB3 in RAPID mode with 13 W and 15 W and 50% overlapped point-by-point fashion with 7 W/30 seconds, 8.5 W/20 seconds, 10 W/20 seconds, and 12 W/20 seconds. Lesion depth, width, and continuity were compared. Lesion continuity was classified by the visible gap degree categorized from 1 (perfect) to 3 (poor). Thermodynamics and maximum tissue temperatures were assessed under infrared thermographic monitoring. Fifteen and 5 lesions were evaluated per ablation protocol for measurement of lesion size and continuity and for thermographic assessment, respectively. Results: Lesion depth and width were smaller in RAPID mode laser ablation than point-by-point laser ablation ( Conclusion: RAPID mode LB3 ablation could provide fast, gapless, and acceptable lesion formation with thermal stacking and moderate tissue temperature rise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.