Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35734267›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2022

Documentation from trained medical students has a low rate of relative downcoding for emergency medicine encounters.

David S Tillman, Corlin M Jewell, Dann J Hekman, Adam M Nicholson, Benjamin H Schnapp, Michael R Lasarev, Roxana Alexandridis, Jamie M Hess, Mary C Westergaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David S TillmanBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-7591
Corlin M JewellBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-6918
Dann J HekmanBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Adam M NicholsonBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Benjamin H SchnappBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-8269
Michael R LasarevDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Roxana AlexandridisDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Jamie M HessBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Mary C WestergaardBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since 2018, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines have allowed teaching physicians to bill for evaluation and management services based on medical student documentation. Limited previous data suggest that medical student documentation suffers from a high rate of downcoding relative to faculty documentation. We sought to compare the coding outcomes of documentation performed by medical students, and not edited by faculty, with documentation edited and submitted by faculty. Methods: A total of 104 randomly selected notes from real patient encounters written by senior medical students were compared to the revised notes submitted by faculty. The note pairs were then split and reviewed by blinded professional coders and assigned level of service (LoS) codes 1-5 (corresponding to E&M CPT codes 99281-99285). Results: We found that the LoS agreement between student and faculty note versions was 63%, with 23% of all student notes receiving lower LoS compared to faculty notes (downcoded). This was found to be similar to baseline variability in professional coder LoS designations. Conclusions: Notes from medical students who have completed a focused documentation curriculum have less LoS downcoding than in previous reports.

Identifiers

PMID35734267
PMCPMC9197152
OpenAlexW4220915947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.