ArticlePublic health action2022
Monitoring and evaluation of HIV screening and testing of hospitalized infants and their mothers.
Article in Public health action, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing the HIV care continuum among children and adolescents with HIV in eastern and southern Africa in the era of "Universal Test and Treat": A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Pooled it
- Very low HIV positivity on paediatric surgical wards in Mozambique: Implications for inpatient provider-initiated testing programmes.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingImproved HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is urgently needed to help close gaps in inpatient infant provider-initiated testing and counseling (PITC) and pediatric case identification. A revised reporting system was piloted on the Breastfeeding Ward at Hospital Central de Maputo in Maputo, Mozambique.
objectiveTo demonstrate how a simplified reporting system designed for pediatric inpatient ward registers can be used to easily calculate key PITC indicators, including testing coverage, HIV status, linkage to antiretroviral therapy, maternal testing, and point-of-care nucleic acid testing.
designThis was a retrospective review of PITC data documented in the ward discharge register for all inpatient infants with charts closed from January 1 to June 30, 2020.
resultsAt chart closure, 97.7% of infants (477/488) had known serostatus: 76.3% were not exposed (364/477), 15.3% were exposed (73/477), 1.9% definitively non-infected (9/477), and 6.5% infected (31/477). There was a 26.9% positivity rate (14/52) for infant point-of-care nucleic acid testing. Of all HIV-infected infants, 80.6% (25/31) were linked to antiretroviral therapy by the time of discharge. Preferred maternal testing was done in 80.5% of eligible mothers (276/343), with 3.0% newly positive (8/276).
conclusionThis straightforward PITC reporting system enabled simple calculation of key indicators needed for standard M&E, contributed to quality improvement efforts to increase testing coverage, and could be easily adapted for use in other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.