ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Disease-Ligand Identification Based on Flexible Neural Tree.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to screen the disease-related compounds of a traditional Chinese medicine prescription in network pharmacology research accurately, a new virtual screening method based on flexible neural tree (FNT) model, hybrid evolutionary method and negative sample selection algorithm is proposed. A novel hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on the Grammar-guided genetic programming and salp swarm algorithm is proposed to infer the optimal FNT. According to hypertension, diabetes, and Corona Virus Disease 2019, disease-related compounds are collected from the up-to-date literatures. The unrelated compounds are chosen by negative sample selection algorithm. ECFP6, MACCS, Macrocycle, and RDKit are utilized to numerically characterize the chemical structure of each compound collected, respectively. The experiment results show that our proposed method performs better than classical classifiers [Support Vector Machine (SVM), random forest (RF), AdaBoost, decision tree (DT), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), KNN, logic regression (LR), and Naive Bayes (NB)], up-to-date classifier (gcForest), and deep learning method (forgeNet) in terms of AUC, ROC, TPR, FPR, Precision, Specificity, and F1. MACCS method is suitable for the maximum number of classifiers. All methods perform poorly with ECFP6 molecular descriptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.