Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733789›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

AlphaFold2 and CryoEM: Revisiting CryoEM modeling in near-atomic resolution density maps.

Corey F Hryc, Matthew L Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modular Structure and Polymerization Status of GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Corey F HrycDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Structural Biology Imaging Center, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Matthew L BakerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Structural Biology Imaging Center, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Funding

PROJECT 5 - DUKE - STRUCTURE VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT FOR PROTEINS AND N. ACIDSP01GM063210 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI ADAMS, PAUL DAVID · 2001 to 2021
$33.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM063210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of new artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, predictive modeling can, in some cases, produce structures on par with experimental methods. The combination of predictive modeling and experimental structure determination by electron cryomicroscopy (cryoEM) offers a tantalizing approach for producing robust atomic models of macromolecular assemblies. Here, we apply AlphaFold2 to a set of community standard data sets and compare the results with the corresponding reference maps and models. Moreover, we present three unique case studies from previously determined cryoEM density maps of viruses. Our results show that AlphaFold2 can not only produce reasonably accurate models for analysis and additional hypotheses testing, but can also potentially yield incorrect structures if not properly validated with experimental data. Whereas we outline numerous shortcomings and potential pitfalls of predictive modeling, the obvious synergy between predictive modeling and cryoEM will undoubtedly result in new computational modeling tools.

Indexed as

BiochemistryComputational molecular modellingStructural biology

Identifiers

PMID35733789
PMCPMC9207676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.