Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733788›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Temporal responses of bumblebee gustatory neurons to sugars.

Rachel H Parkinson, Sébastien C Kessler, Jennifer Scott, Alexander Simpson, Jennifer Bu, Mushtaq Al-Esawy, Adam Mahdi, Ashwin Miriyala, Geraldine A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel H ParkinsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
Sébastien C KesslerInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Jennifer ScottDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
Alexander SimpsonInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Jennifer BuSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Mushtaq Al-EsawyDepartment of Plant Protection, University of Kufa, Kufa, Iraq.
Adam MahdiOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3JS, UK.
Ashwin MiriyalaCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Geraldine A WrightDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of taste permits the recognition of valuable nutrients and the avoidance of potential toxins. Previously, we found that bumblebees have a specialized mechanism for sensing sugars whereby two gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) within the galeal sensilla of the bees' mouthparts exhibit bursts of spikes. Here, we show that the temporal firing patterns of these GRNs separate sugars into four distinct groups that correlate with sugar nutritional value and palatability. We also identified a third GRN that responded to stimulation with relatively high concentrations of fructose, sucrose, and maltose. Sugars that were nonmetabolizable or toxic suppressed the responses of bursting GRNs to sucrose. These abilities to encode information about sugar value are a refinement to the bumblebee's sense of sweet taste that could be an adaptation that enables precise calculations of the nature and nutritional value of floral nectar.

Indexed as

biological sciencesneurosciencesensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID35733788
PMCPMC9207677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.