ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Clinical Application of a Multiparameter-Based Nomogram Model in Predicting Preeclampsia.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Clinical Application of a Multiparameter-Based Nomogram Model in Predicting Preeclampsia.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-04Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on single-center data, the related predictive factors of preeclampsia (PE) were investigated, and a nomogram prediction model was established and validated. A retrospective collection of 93 PE patients admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were included in the PE group. In addition, non-PE pregnant women were selected for physical examination during the same period for matching, and 170 normal pregnant women who met the matching conditions were found as the normal pregnancy group. Clinical data of the selected candidates were collected. The risk factors of PE were screened by logistic regression analysis, and the lipopograph prediction model was constructed and verified. Logistic analysis results showed that age (OR = 3.069, 95% CI = 1.233-7.638), prepregnancy BMI (OR = 2.896, 95% CI = 1.193-7.029), vitamin E deficiency (OR = 2.803, 95% CI = 1.134-6.928), 25-(OH)D (OR = 0.944, 95% CI = 0.903∼9.988), PLGF (OR = 0.887, 95% CI = 0.851∼0.924), PAPP-A (OR = 1.240, 95% CI = 1.131∼1.360), and PI (OR = 6.376, 95% CI = 1.163∼34.967) were the independent risk factors for PE prediction (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.