ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Artificial Intelligence-Based Semisupervised Self-Training Algorithm in Pathological Tissue Image Segmentation.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Analysis Using MRI and PET Imaging in Gliomas: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- A teacher-student framework with Fourier Transform augmentation for COVID-19 infection segmentation in CT images.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Article
- Retracted: Artificial Intelligence-Based Semisupervised Self-Training Algorithm in Pathological Tissue Image Segmentation.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-02Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/EECAA2F75BDBEFFC7327C6F94B90BB
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of medical image processing, due to the differences in tissues, organs, and imaging methods, obtained medical images have significant differences. With the development of intelligence in medicine, an increasing number of computing optimization algorithms based on AI technology have also been applied to the field of medicine. Because the image segmentation algorithm based on the semisupervised self-training algorithm solves initialization class center large randomness problem in the traditional cluster-based image segmentation algorithm, this article aims to integrate the artificial intelligence semisupervised self-training algorithm into the pathological tissue image segmentation problem. An experimental group is designed to collect sample images and the algorithm proposed in this article is used to perform image segmentation to achieve a better visual experience and images. Although there is no general image segmentation theory, many scholars have been committed to applying new concepts and new methods to image segmentation in recent years and combining specific theoretical image segmentation methods has achieved good application results in image segmentation. For example, wavelet analysis, wavelet transform, neural networks, and genetic algorithms can effectively improve the segmentation effect. The results of the Seg cutting method designed in this article show that, in retinal blood vessel segmentation results on a database of healthy people, the sensitivity value is 0.941633, the false-positive rate is 0.952933, the specificity is 0.956787, and the accuracy rate is 0.96182, which are all higher than those in other methods. Image cutting methods such as FNN, CNN, and AWN have addressed the case tissue image cutting problem. Using the Seg cutting method designed in this article to segment the retinal blood vessels on a diabetes patient database, the sensitivity value is 0.8106, the false-positive rate is 0.0511, the specificity is 0.9712, the accuracy is 0.9421, and the false-positive rate is omitted. The false-positive rate is lower than AWN, and other indicators are higher than FNN, CNN, AWN, and other image cutting methods. The application of artificial intelligence-based semisupervised self-training algorithms in pathological tissue image segmentation is realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.