Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733511›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

Application of Transurethral Prostate Resection Instrumentation for Treating Low Rectal Anastomotic Leakage: A Pilot Study.

Zhenming Zhang, Zhentao Hu, Yujie Qin, Jun Qian, Song Tu, Jiaxi Yao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhenming Zhang *Department of General Surgery II, Hexi University Affiliated Zhangye People's Hospital, Zhangye, Gansu, 734000, People's Republic of China.
Zhentao Hu *Department of General Surgery II, Hexi University Affiliated Zhangye People's Hospital, Zhangye, Gansu, 734000, People's Republic of China.
Yujie Qin *Department of Endoscopy Center, Hexi University Affiliated Zhangye People's Hospital, Zhangye, Gansu, 734000, People's Republic of China.
Jun QianInstitute of Urology, Hexi University, Zhangye, Gansu, 734000, People's Republic of China.
Song TuDepartment of General Surgery II, Hexi University Affiliated Zhangye People's Hospital, Zhangye, Gansu, 734000, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxi YaoInstitute of Urology, Hexi University, Zhangye, Gansu, 734000, People's Republic of China.
Hexi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine an accurate method of inspecting low anastomotic leakages and application of transurethral prostate resection instrumentation for treating low rectal anastomotic leakage. Patients and Methods: Clinical data of eight patients treated for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery at Zhangye People's Hospital (affiliated to Hexi University), from August 2019 to November 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Transanal prostate resection instrumentation was used to assess the leakage and surrounding conditions. Using prostate resection instrumentation, the presacral and perirectal residual cavities were washed and removed, and indwelling suprapubic presacral, transanal presacral, and rectal drainage tubes were placed. Continuous presacral saline irrigation and drainage and open negative-pressure suction in the rectal cavity were performed until the patients' fistula healed. Results: Of the eight patients with anastomotic leakages, one had grade B and seven had grade C International Study Group of Rectal Cancer anastomotic leakage classifications following Dixon operation. Transanal prostate resection instrumentation showed that the leakage of the one patient with grade B was less than a third of the circumference of the anastomosis. Among the seven patients with grade C, one leakage was less than a third of the anastomotic circumference. One patient had complete separation of the anastomosis and one distal colon necrosis, which necessitated immediate descending colostomy. Conservative treatment was successful in six patients; the conservative overall cure rate was 75%, and the median healing time was 43 (21-68) days. Conclusion: Transanal examination of rectal anastomotic leakage using prostate resection instrumentation is comprehensive, easy to perform, provides clear visualization, accurately guides catheter placement, and can be combined with continuous open negative-pressure drainage, which is a safe, convenient, and effective method for treating low rectal leakage.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakagecatheternegative-pressure drainageprostate resection instrumentation

Identifiers

PMID35733511
PMCPMC9208375
OpenAlexW4282935515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.