ArticleCureus2022
Outcomes of the Treatment of Fracture Non-union Using Combined Magnetic Field Bone Growth Stimulation: Experiences From a UK Trauma Unit.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of electrical bone stimulation on bone union in foot and ankle injuries: A scoping review.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2025Article
- Article
- Gathering Evidence to Leverage Musculoskeletal Magnetic Stimulation Towards Clinical Applicability.Small science · 2024Article
- Smokeless Tobacco Use is Associated with Worse Outcomes Following Open Tibia Fracture.Orthopedic reviews · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFracture non-union is a distressing diagnosis for both patients and clinicians. Several methods have been tried to help promote bone healing. Some of the non-operative strategies include the use of pulsed ultrasound and electrical or magnetic bone stimulators. This study aimed at assessing the outcomes of patients treated with combined magnetic field (CMF) bone stimulators.
methodsAll patients with confirmed fracture non-union treated using a CMF bone growth stimulator between May 2019 and December 2021 were included in the study. These were followed up at regular three-month intervals and monitored for signs of clinical and radiological union. The minimum patient follow-up was six months. Our primary outcome measure was union rates following CMF treatment. The secondary outcome measures were time to union and fracture type/configuration in relation to non-union.
resultsA total of 29 patients were included. Of the patients, 52% were female. The average age of the patients was 53.42 years (SD: 17.66 years). Four were excluded because their follow-up period was less than six months. Patients were started on CMF bone growth stimulant treatment between four and 27 months from the initial fracture (mean: 11.56 months). The majority of the patients had tibial shaft (21%), distal femur (17%), ankle (10%) and distal humerus (10%) fractures. The overall success rate was 84% (n=21), with a mean time to union of 6.62 months.
conclusionBone growth stimulators using combined magnetic fields are a viable treatment option for established fracture non-union. They can result in improved outcomes and can avoid risks and costs associated with surgical options to treat non-union. However, more studies need to be conducted to establish the efficacy of these methods conclusively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.