ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
Effect of High-Quality Nursing Care on Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated with Respiratory Failure: An Observational Cohort Study.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Irisin maintains ER homeostasis and activates AMPK via integrin αVβ5 to attenuate CSE + LPS-induced emphysema and inflammation.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Current State of COPD Nursing Based on a Bibliometric Approach from the Web of Science.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
- Retracted: Effect of High-Quality Nursing Care on Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Complicated with Respiratory Failure: An Observational Cohort Study.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-20Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the efficacy of high-quality nursing care on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) complicated with respiratory failure. Methods: A total of 84 AECOPD patients were included in this study. Lung function indexes, nursing satisfaction, and arterial blood gas index were collected to assess the efficacy of high-quality nursing care on patients with acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with respiratory failure. Results: The level of lung function after treatment had a statistical difference between the two groups ( Conclusion: High-quality nursing intervention has good therapeutic effect on acute exacerbation of COPD complicated with respiratory failure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.