Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733416›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2022

Time trends in the incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection by indication and operative technique.

Christopher A Lewis-Lloyd, Colin J Crooks, Joe West, Oliver Peacock, David J Humes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Time trends in the incidence rates of venous thromboembolism following colorectal resection by indication and operative technique.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher A Lewis-LloydGastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9996-3699
Colin J CrooksGastrointestinal and Liver Theme, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6794-6621
Joe WestGastrointestinal and Liver Theme, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-9356
Oliver PeacockDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-4301
David J HumesGastrointestinal Surgery, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7071-4098
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIt is important for patient safety to assess if international changes in perioperative care, such as the focus on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and minimally invasive surgery, have reduced the high post colectomy VTE risks previously reported. This study assesses the impact of changes in perioperative care on VTE risk following colorectal resection.

methodThis was a population-based cohort study of colectomy patients in England between 2000 and 2019 using a national database of linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data. Within 30 days following colectomy, absolute VTE rates per 1000 person-years and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) using Poisson regression for the per year change in VTE risk were calculated.

resultsOf 183 791 patients, 1337 (0.73%) developed 30-day postoperative VTE. Overall, VTE rates reduced over the 20-year study period following elective (relative risk reduction 31.25%, 95% CI 5.69%-49.88%) but not emergency surgery. Similarly, yearly changes in VTE risk reduced following minimally invasive resections (elective benign, aIRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.97; elective malignant, aIRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98; and emergency benign, aIRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00) but not following open resections. There was a per year VTE risk increase following open emergency malignant resections (aIRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04).

conclusionYearly VTE risks reduced following minimally invasive surgeries in the elective setting yet in contrast were static following open elective colectomies, and following emergency malignant resections increased by almost 2% per year. To reduce VTE risk, further efforts are required to implement advances in surgical care for those having emergency and/or open surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsVenous ThromboembolismCohort StudiesHumansIncidencePostoperative ComplicationsRisk Factorscolorectal surgeryepidemiologygeneral surgerypulmonary embolismvenous thromboembolismvenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID35733416
PMCPMC9796069
OpenAlexW4283318492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.