Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733390›Full record

ArticleNew solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS2022

The Sad, Sad Story of OSHA's Failure to Protect Workers From COVID-19.

Randy Rabinowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Racial Justice Demands a Permanent OSHA Standard to Protect All Workers From COVID-19.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Randy RabinowitzOSH Law Project, LLC, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-4124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of a global pandemic posing unprecedented risks to worker health, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), the agency charged with protecting workers from occupational illness, has floundered. Its efforts to protect workers have been too little, too late, poorly designed, and entangled in legal controversy. Two years into a pandemic that has posed the greatest threat to worker health in our lifetimes, OSHA has adopted no effective, COVID-19-specific protections for workers. This article chronicles OSHA's efforts and the response of the courts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational ExposureHumansUnited StatesUnited States Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationCOVID-19emergency temporary standardOSHA

Identifiers

PMID35733390
PMCPMC9226955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.