Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733239›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2022

Parcellation-based tractographic modeling of the salience network through meta-analysis.

Robert G Briggs, Isabella M Young, Nicholas B Dadario, R Dineth Fonseka, Jorge Hormovas, Parker Allan, Micah L Larsen, Yueh-Hsin Lin, Onur Tanglay, B David Maxwell and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What is the cognitive footprint of insular glioma?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. The Brain Connectome for Clinical Neuroscience.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Robert G BriggsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Isabella M YoungOmniscient Neurotechnology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas B DadarioRobert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-187X
R Dineth FonsekaCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jorge HormovasCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Parker AllanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Micah L LarsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Yueh-Hsin LinCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Onur TanglayCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2071-6909
B David MaxwellDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Andrew K ConnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Jordan F StaffordDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Chad A GlennDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Charles TeoCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael E SughrueCentre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5407-2585

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe salience network (SN) is a transitory mediator between active and passive states of mind. Multiple cortical areas, including the opercular, insular, and cingulate cortices have been linked in this processing, though knowledge of network connectivity has been devoid of structural specificity.

objectiveThe current study sought to create an anatomically specific connectivity model of the neural substrates involved in the salience network.

methodsA literature search of PubMed and BrainMap Sleuth was conducted for resting-state and task-based fMRI studies relevant to the salience network according to PRISMA guidelines. Publicly available meta-analytic software was utilized to extract relevant fMRI data for the creation of an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) map and relevant parcellations from the human connectome project overlapping with the ALE data were identified for inclusion in our SN model. DSI-based fiber tractography was then performed on publicaly available data from healthy subjects to determine the structural connections between cortical parcellations comprising the network.

resultsNine cortical regions were found to comprise the salience network: areas AVI (anterior ventral insula), MI (middle insula), FOP4 (frontal operculum 4), FOP5 (frontal operculum 5), a24pr (anterior 24 prime), a32pr (anterior 32 prime), p32pr (posterior 32 prime), and SCEF (supplementary and cingulate eye field), and 46. The frontal aslant tract was found to connect the opercular-insular cluster to the middle cingulate clusters of the network, while mostly short U-fibers connected adjacent nodes of the network.

conclusionHere we provide an anatomically specific connectivity model of the neural substrates involved in the salience network. These results may serve as an empiric basis for clinical translation in this region and for future study which seeks to expand our understanding of how specific neural substrates are involved in salience processing and guide subsequent human behavior.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexConnectomeBrain MappingFrontal LobeGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Pathwaysanatomyparcellationsalience networktractography

Identifiers

PMID35733239
PMCPMC9304834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.