Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733238›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2022

Voice-Hearing Across The Continuum: A Phenomenology of Spiritual Voices.

Peter Moseley, Adam Powell, Angela Woods, Charles Fernyhough, Ben Alderson-Day

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Shaman and Schizophrenia, Revisited.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter MoseleyDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-2509
Adam PowellDepartment of Theology & Religion, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Angela WoodsDepartment of English Studies, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Charles FernyhoughDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, Durham, UK.
Ben Alderson-DayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-8043

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT108720Wellcome Trust WT 209513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisVoice-hearing in clinical and nonclinical groups has previously been compared using standardized assessments of psychotic experiences. Findings from several studies suggest that nonclinical voice-hearing is distinguished by reduced distress and increased control. However, symptom-rating scales developed for clinical populations may be limited in their ability to elucidate subtle aspects of nonclinical voices. Moreover, such experiences often occur within specific contexts and belief systems, such as spiritualism. We investigated similarities and differences in the phenomenology of clinical voice-hearing and nonclinical voice-hearer (NCVH). STUDY

designWe conducted a comparative interdisciplinary study which administered a semi-structured interview to NCVH individuals (N = 26) and psychosis patients (N = 40). The nonclinical group was recruited from spiritualist communities. We used content analysis and inductive thematic analysis to create a coding frame which was used across both spiritual and patient groups to compare phenomenological features of voice-hearing. STUDY

resultsThe findings were consistent with previous results regarding distress and control. Additionally, in the NCVH group, multiple modalities were often integrated into 1 entity, and there were high levels of associated visual imagery, and subtle differences in the location of voices relating to perceptual boundaries. Most NCVHs reported voices before encountering spiritualism, suggesting that their onset was not solely due to deliberate practice.

conclusionsNonclinical spiritual voice-hearing has important similarities and differences to voices in psychosis. Future research should aim to understand how spiritual voice-hearers cultivate and control voice-hearing after its onset, which may inform interventions for people with psychosis with distressing voices.

Indexed as

HallucinationsPsychotic DisordersHearingHumanscomparative phenomenologycontroldistresshallucinations

Identifiers

PMID35733238
PMCPMC9434432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.