Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733196›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2022

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine behaviour intentions among the youth in Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Joachim O Osur, Rehema Chengo, Evelyne Muinga, Jackline Kemboi, Myriam Sidibe, Maggie Rarieya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Kenyans' Perceptions of the Risks of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Scoping Review.Pan-African journal of health and environmental science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joachim O OsurDepartment of Rehabilitative Medicine, School of medical Sciences, Amref International University, P.O. Box 27691-00506, Nairobi, Kenya. Joachim.osur@amref.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-1553
Rehema ChengoDepartment of Technical Directorate Unit, Amref Health Africa Headquarters, P.O. Box 27691-00506, Nairobi, Kenya.
Evelyne MuingaDepartment of Technical Directorate Unit, Amref Health Africa Headquarters, P.O. Box 27691-00506, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jackline KemboiDepartment of Technical Directorate Unit, Amref Health Africa Headquarters, P.O. Box 27691-00506, Nairobi, Kenya.
Myriam SidibeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and Brands on a Mission, London, UK.
Maggie RarieyaThe National Business compact on Corona, Nairobi, Kenya.
Amref Health Africa · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

King Baudouin Foundation United States N219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 has become a public health concern globally with increased numbers of cases of the disease and deaths reported daily. The key strategy for the prevention of COVID-19 disease is to enhance mass COVID-19 vaccination. However, mass vaccination faces challenges of hesitation to acceptance of the vaccine in the community. The youth may not be among the vulnerable population to severe COVID-19 disease but are highly susceptible to contracting the virus and spreading it. The aim of the study was to assess COVID-19 vaccine youth behavior intentions and their determinants in Kenya.

methodsThe study used a mixed method design, employing a cross-sectional survey and focused group discussions across 47 counties in Urban, Peri-Urban and Rural settings of Kenya. The interviewees were youths aged 18-35, registered in online platforms/peer groups that included Shujaaz, Brck Moja, Aiffluence, Y Act and Heroes for Change. Quantitative data was collected using Google forms. A total of 665 interviews were conducted. Quantitative data was analysed using STATA version 16. In this paper we report quantitative study findings.

resultsThe findings of the study indicated that only 42% of the youth were ready to be vaccinated, with 52% adopting a wait and see approach to what happens to those who had received the vaccine and 6% totally unwilling to be vaccinated. The determinants of these behavior intentions included: the perceived adverse effects of the vaccine on health, inadequate information about the COVID-19 vaccine, conflicting information about COVID-19 vaccine from the social media, religious implications of the vaccine, impact of education level on understanding of the vaccine, perceived risk of contracting the COVID-19 disease, efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, COVID-19 affecting women than men and trust in the ministry of health to lead COVID-19 interventions. Significantly it was found that hesitancy is higher among females, protestants and those with post-secondary education. Lack of information and concerns around vaccine safety and effectiveness were main cause of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Social media was the major source of information contributing to hesitancy. Other contributors to hesitancy included low trust in the MoH and belief that mass vaccination is not helpful.

conclusionVaccine hesitancy remains high among the youth but the causes of it are modifiable and health systems need to have evidence based engagements with the youth to reduce vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

EffectivenesSafetyVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35733196
PMCPMC9217729
OpenAlexW4283322342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.