Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733098›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2022

Combined conventional speech therapy and functional electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients with dyphagia: a randomized controlled trial.

Klayne Cunha Matos, Vanessa Fernandes de Oliveira, Paula Luanna Carvalho de Oliveira, Fabíola Aureliano Carvalho, Maria Renata Matos de Mesquita, Camila Gabriella da Silva Queiroz, Levi Mota Marques, Débora Lilian Nascimento Lima, Fernanda Martins Maia Carvalho, Pedro Braga-Neto

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03649295 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Study of the Influence of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Dysphagia After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Geral de FortalezaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled33ConditionsDysphagia, Oropharyngeal, Stroke, IschemicArmsFunctional Electrical Stimulation, Conventional Speech Therapy
NCT06887855 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Post-Stroke Dysphagia Rehabilitation Via the Synergistic Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Neuromuscular Taping, and Swallowing Exercises: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamad Medical CorporationRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsDysphagia After StrokeArmsNeuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Neuromuscular Taping, Swallowing exercise (Expiratory Muscle Strength Training), Swallowing exercise (Chin Tuck Against Resistance)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Evidence based therapeutic and assessment techniques to rehabilitate post stroke dysphagia patients-A systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ethical Challenges and Considerations in Dysphagia Management: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Klayne Cunha MatosSpeech Therapy Service, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Vanessa Fernandes de OliveiraDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Paula Luanna Carvalho de OliveiraSpeech Therapy Service, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Fabíola Aureliano CarvalhoSpeech Therapy Service, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Maria Renata Matos de MesquitaDepartment of Medicine, Centro Universitário INTA, Sobral, Brazil.
Camila Gabriella da Silva QueirozOtorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Levi Mota MarquesOtorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Débora Lilian Nascimento LimaOtorhinolaryngology Service, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Fernanda Martins Maia CarvalhoMedical Sciences Post-Graduation Program, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Pedro Braga-NetoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. pbraganeto@ufc.br.
Hospital Geral de Fortaleza · BRInstituto Superior de Teologia Aplicada · BRUniversidade de Fortaleza · BRUniversidade Estadual do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is the main cause of oropharyngeal neurogenic dysphagia. Electrostimulation has been used as a therapeutic tool in these cases. However, there are few studies that prove its effectiveness. We evaluated the effect of functional electrostimulation as a complement to conventional speech therapy in patients with dysphagia after a stroke in a stroke unit.

methodsWe performed a clinical, randomized, and controlled trial divided into intervention group (IG) (n = 16) and control group (CG) (n = 17). All patients were treated with conventional speech therapy, and the IG also was submitted to the functional electrotherapy. Primary outcomes were Functional Oral Ingestion Scale (FOIS) and Swallowing videoendoscopy (FEES). The degree of dysphagia was scored in functional, mild, moderate and severe dysphagia according to FEES procedure. Dysphagia Risk Evaluation Protocol (DREP) was considered a secondary outcome.

resultsThere was a significant difference regarding FOIS scores after 5 days of intervention in groups. Both groups also showed a tendency to improve dysphagia levels measured by FEES, although not statistically significant. Improvements on oral feeding was seen in both groups. No significant differences between groups before and after the intervention were detected by DREP scores. Electrical stimulation did not show additional benefits beyond conventional therapy when comparing outcomes between groups.

conclusionConventional speech therapy improved oral ingestion even regardless the use of electrostimulation in a stroke unit.

trial registrationThis research was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03649295 ) in 28/08/2018 and in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) (Register Number: RBR-56QK5J), approval date: 18/12/2018. HGF Ethics Committee Approval Number: N. 2.388.931.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersElectric Stimulation TherapyStrokeStroke RehabilitationDeglutitionElectric StimulationHumansSpeech TherapyTreatment OutcomeDysphagiaElectrical stimulationRehabilitationSpeech therapyStroke

Identifiers

PMID35733098
PMCPMC9215026
OpenAlexW4283367018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.