Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35733050›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Cell Interplay Model to Assess the Impact of Glioma Cells on Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability.

Cláudia Martins, Bruno Sarmento

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cláudia MartinsInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Bruno SarmentoInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. bruno.sarmento@ineb.up.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the most selective protecting layer of the central nervous system (CNS) with unique neurovascular features. The BBB is known to undergo a process of molecular alterations during disease state, such as in the case of glioma. This results in a non-uniform permeability along the BBB layer, which retains intact regions but develops focal sites of higher leakiness, especially in the surrounds of the tumor core. Although essential to guarantee brain homeostasis, the BBB has been the Achilles heel of drug delivery to the brain since the early times of the first classification as "barrier," more than a century ago. Due to the presence of the BBB, the transport of drug molecules from the bloodstream to the brain parenchyma is highly restricted, and, therefore, clinically relevant therapeutic concentrations cannot be achieved. Research efforts have focused on the development of novel tools to ameliorate drug permeability across the BBB, including drug formulation into non-invasive delivery systems with brain targeting properties and techniques that allow a temporary disruption of the BBB. To strengthen the advancement of potential drug candidates, in vitro models that recapitulate the main in vivo features of BBB are required to perform a preliminary screening of permeability, both in health and disease conditions. Herein, a protocol to assemble a BBB in vitro model to screen drug permeability in a glioma disease state is detailed. The model consists of a BBB and glioma cell co-culture and aims at exploiting the effect of the interplay between the cell constituents on the permeability of drug molecules. Although simple and straightforward, the herein in vitro model presents a high reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and a favorable time-benefit balance.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierGliomaBiological TransportHumansPermeabilityPharmaceutical PreparationsReproducibility of ResultsPharmaceutical PreparationsBlood–brain barrierCell interplayCo-cultureDrug permeabilityGlioma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.