Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732870›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing.

Arturo Torres Ortiz, Fernanda Fenn Torrente, Adam Twigg, James Hatcher, Anja Saso, Tanya Lam, Marina Johnson, Helen Wagstaffe, Rishi Dhillon, Anabelle Lea Mai and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04380896 (COVID-19 Staff Testing of Antibody Responses Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04380896 completednot on this map

COVID-19 Staff Testing of Antibody Responses Study (CO-STARS)

TypeobservationalSponsorGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustRan2020 to 2022Enrolled3,502ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 InfectionArmsBlood test, Standardised questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels in a Cohort of Health Care Workers Before and After the Omicron Wave in Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Socioeconomic and Demographic Risk Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity Among Healthcare Workers in a UK Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Arturo Torres OrtizDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Fernanda Fenn TorrenteDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Adam TwiggDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
James HatcherDepartment of Microbiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Anja SasoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Tanya LamDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Marina JohnsonDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Helen WagstaffeDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Rishi DhillonPublic Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK.
Anabelle Lea MaiClinical Immunology, Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
David GoldblattDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Rachel StillLaboratory Medicine Service Swansea, Bay University Health Board Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK.
Matthew BucklandClinical Immunology, Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Kimberly GilmourClinical Immunology, Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Louis GrandjeanDepartment of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. l.grandjean@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBMorriston Hospital · GBPublic Health Wales · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Using the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genome to Predict Tuberculosis Pathology, Drug Resistance Acquisition and Identify Community Transmission SitesR01AI146338 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILMAN, ROBERT H · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146338Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 201470/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 220565/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive serological testing is essential to estimate the proportion of the population exposed or infected with SARS-CoV-2, to guide booster vaccination and to select patients for treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The performance of serological tests is usually evaluated at 14-21 days post infection. This approach fails to take account of the important effect of time on test performance after infection or exposure has occurred. We performed parallel serological testing using 4 widely used assays (a multiplexed SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein (N), Spike (S) and Receptor Binding Domain assay from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD), the Roche Elecsys-Nucleoprotein (Roche-N) and Spike (Roche-S) assays and the Abbott Nucleoprotein assay (Abbott-N) on serial positive monthly samples collected as part of the Co-STARs study ( www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04380896) up to 200 days following infection. Our findings demonstrate the considerable effect of time since symptom onset on the diagnostic sensitivity of different assays. Using a time-to-event analysis, we demonstrated that 50% of the Abbott nucleoprotein assays will give a negative result after 175 days (median survival time 95% CI 168-185 days), compared to the better performance over time of the Roche Elecsys nucleoprotein assay (93% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 88-97%). Assays targeting the spike protein showed a lower decline over the follow-up period, both for the MSD spike assay (97% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 95-99%) and the Roche Elecsys spike assay (95% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 93-97%). The best performing quantitative Roche Elecsys Spike assay showed no evidence of waning Spike antibody titers over the 200-day time course of the study. We have shown that compared to other assays evaluated, the Abbott-N assay fails to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as time passes since infection. In contrast the Roche Elecsys Spike Assay and the MSD assay maintained a high sensitivity for the 200-day duration of the study. These limitations of the Abbott assay should be considered when quantifying the immune correlates of protection or the need for SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapy. The high levels of maintained detectable neutralizing spike antibody titers identified by the quantitative Roche Elecsys assay is encouraging and provides further evidence in support of long-lasting SARS-CoV-2 protection following natural infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralClinical Studies as TopicHumansNucleoproteinsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralNucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID35732870
PMCPMC9214469
OpenAlexW4283363247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.