Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732843›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2022

Postmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalities.

Aladdin C Speelman, Penelope C Engel-Hills, Lorna J Martin, Rick R van Rijn, Amaka C Offiah

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aladdin C SpeelmanRadiography (Diagnostic), Department of Medical Imaging and Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville, 7530, Cape Town, South Africa. speelmana@cput.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-0488-0343
Penelope C Engel-HillsFaculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville, 7530, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1084-769X
Lorna J MartinDivision of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1231-7932
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8876-6515
Amaka C OffiahUniversity of Sheffield and Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-5036
Cape Peninsula University of Technology · ZANetherlands Forensic Institute · NLSheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmortem computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have been gradually introduced to forensic pathology centres over the past two decades, with varying results in comparison to autopsy.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of postmortem CT in determining a cause of death in children who died of unnatural causes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a prospective recruitment of 30 children (< 18 years) who underwent postmortem CT and a forensic autopsy. A cause of death was independently assigned by two experienced paediatric radiologists and compared to that of the forensic autopsy.

resultsA correct cause of death was assigned by reviewers 1 and 2 in 70% (n = 21/30) and 67% (n = 20/30) of cases, respectively. For gunshot injuries and blunt force head injuries, there was 91% (n = 10/11) and 100% (n = 6/6) agreement between forensic autopsy and both reviewers, respectively. No cause of death could be assigned by reviewers 1 and 2 in 27% (n = 8) and 30% (n = 9) of cases, respectively. An incorrect cause of death was assigned by both reviewers in one case (3%). The Cohen Kappa level of agreement between the forensic autopsy and reviewers 1 and 2 was k = 0.624 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.80, P = 0) and k = 0.582 (95% CI 0.41-0.76, P = 0), respectively. There was near perfect agreement between reviewers 1 and 2 (k = 0.905) (95% CI 0.78-1.00, P = 0).

conclusionPostmortem CT has good diagnostic accuracy for identifying a cause of death related to trauma, but it has poor accuracy for children dying from causes not associated with apparent physical injury.

Indexed as

Head Injuries, ClosedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutopsyChildForensic PathologyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesAutopsyCause of deathChild fatalitiesChildrenComputed tomographyForensicPostmortem

Identifiers

PMID35732843
OpenAlexW4283321423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.