ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022
Persistent coagulopathy after gunshot traumatic brain injury: the importance of INR and the SPIN score.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning models predict coagulopathy in traumatic brain injury patients in ER.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPenetrating ballistic brain injury (gunshot traumatic brain injury or GTBI) is associated with a high mortality. Admission Glascow Coma Scale (GCS), injury severity score and neurological findings, cardiopulmonary instability, coagulopathy and radiological finding such as bullet trajectory and mass effect are shown to predict survival after GTBI. We aimed to examine the dynamics of the observed coagulopathy and its association with outcome.
methodsIn this single-centered retrospective cohort study, we examined 88 patients with GTBI between 2015 and 2021. Variables analyzed include patient age; temperature, hemodynamic and respiratory variables, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS); injury severity score (ISS); head abbreviated injury scale (AIS); Marshall, Rotterdam, SPIN and Baylor scores, and laboratory data including PTT, INR and platelet count. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the predictive models.
resultsThe average age of our sample was 28.5 years and a majority were male subjects (92%). Fifty-four (62%) of the patients survived to discharge. The GCS score, as well as the motor, verbal, and eye-opening sub-scores were higher in survivors (P < 0.001). As was expected, radiologic findings including the Marshall and Rotterdam Scores were also associated with survival (P < 0.001). Although the ISS and Head AIS scores were higher (P < 0.001), extracranial injuries were not more prevalent in non-survivors (P= 0.567). Non-survivors had lower platelet counts and elevated PTT and INR (P < 0.001) on admission. PTT normalized within 24 h but INR continued to increase in non-survivors. SPIN score, which includes INR, was a better predictor for mortality than Rotterdam, Marshall, and Baylor etc.
conclusionProgressively increasing INR after GTBI is associated with poor outcome and may indicate consumption coagulopathy from activation of the extrinsic pathway of coagulation and metabolic derangements that are triggered and sustained by the brain injury. The SPIN score, which incorporates INR as a major survival score component, outperforms other available prediction models for predicting outcome after GTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.