ArticleScientific reports2022
Inverted multi-layer internal limiting membrane flap for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels as Promising Carriers for Ophthalmic Disease Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Perfluorodecalin and Viscoelastic-Assisted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for High Myopia Macular Hole Retinal Detachment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Multilayered Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique in Optic Disc Pit Maculopathy.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Correlation between vessel density and thickness in the retina and choroid of severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- The Role of the Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography for Vitreoretinal Surgery in a Real-Life Setting.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Postoperative complications after successful primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Visual Improvement Despite Macular Pucker After Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Idiopathic Macular Hole.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with inverted multi-layer internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap for the treatment of macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia. We retrospectively analysed the medical records of macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) patients with high myopia. The patients were divided into two groups with different surgical procedure: inverted multi-layer ILM flap group (group 1, 27 eyes) and the ILM peeling group (group 2, 29 eyes). Retinal reattachment rate, macular hole closure rate at last follow-up and BCVA at 6 months post-operation were compared between the two groups. After primary PPV and silicone oil removal, the retinal reattachment rate was 96.3% in group 1 and 93.1% in group 2 respectively at last follow-up, showing no statistically significant difference (odds ratio = 0.525, P = 1.000). All eyes in group 1 had type I macular closure (100%, 27/27), while only 7 eyes (24.1%, 7/29) in group 2 have type I macular hole closure. The difference was statistically significant (odds ratio = 0, P < 0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA both improved significantly at 6 months post-operation compared with pre-operation (t = 4.181, P < 0.001; t = 3.217, P < 0.001), however the difference of post-operation BCVA between the two groups was not statistically significant (t = 0.906, P > 0.05). PPV combined with inverted multi-layer ILM flap could achieve better anatomical outcomes than ILM peeling technique with no significant advantage in functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.