ArticleScientific reports2022
Radiological hints for differentiation of cerebellar multiple system atrophy from spinocerebellar ataxia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case report of spinocerebellar ataxia with TRPC3 gene mutation and review of literature.Journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Association Between Cerebellar Metabolic Markers and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Revisiting 'hot cross bun' sign: a multicentre MRI study of 97 patients with autopsy-confirmed multiple system atrophy.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for differentiating SCA3 and MSA-C using gait and postural features from wearable sensors.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Expanding the clinical-radiological phenotype of SCA34 and its role in the differential diagnosis of the hot cross bun sign.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Predictive clinical factors for the progression from idiopathic late-onset cerebellar ataxia to multiple system atrophy cerebellar type.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Applications of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Simple biomarkers to distinguish Parkinson's disease from its mimics in clinical practice: a comprehensive review and future directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Spinocerebellar ataxia-type 34: A case report and brief review of the literature.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Clinical and neuroimaging review of triplet repeat diseases.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiation cerebellar multiple systemic atrophy (MSA-C) from spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is important. The "hot cross bun" sign (HCBS) at pons and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are helpful. However, the prevalence of HCBS and the alteration of cerebellar MRS parameters are evolving with disease progression. We hypothesized that since the HCBS and MRS are evolving with time, different parameters for differentiation of MSA-C and SCA are required at different disease stages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HCBS and MRS changes in patients with MSA-C and SCA at different disease stages. A total of 398 patients with molecularly confirmed SCA (SCA1, 2, 3, 6, 17) and 286 patients diagnosed with probable MSA-C (without mutations in SCA1, 2, 3, 6, 17 genes), who had received brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRS from January 2000 to January 2020, were recruited. Twenty-five patients were molecularly identified as having SCA1, 68 as SCA2, 253 as SCA3, 34 as SCA6, and 18 as SCA17. We compared their clinical parameters and neuroimaging features at different disease stages. The presence of HCBS was assessed using an axial T2 fast spin-echo or FLAIR sequence. Proton MRS was recorded with voxel of interest focusing on cerebellar hemispheres and cerebellar vermis and avoiding cerebrospinal fluid spaces space using a single-voxel stimulated echo acquisition mode sequence. We found that patients with MSA-C tend to have a higher prevalence of pontine HCBS, worse Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia scores, lower cerebellar N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/creatinine (Cr), and choline (Cho)/Cr, compared to patients with SCA at corresponding disease stages. In MSA-C patients with a disease duration < 1 year and without pontine HCBS, a cerebellar NAA/Cr ≤ 0.79 is a good indicator of the possibility of MSA-C. By using the pontine HCBS and cerebellar MRS, discerning MSA-C from SCA became possible. This study provides cutoff values of MRS to serve as clues in differentiating MSA-C from SCAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.