Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732783›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2022

SubCellBarCode: integrated workflow for robust spatial proteomics by mass spectrometry.

Taner Arslan, Yanbo Pan, Georgios Mermelekas, Mattias Vesterlund, Lukas M Orre, Janne Lehtiö

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Subcellular mass spectrometry reveals proteome remodeling in an asymmetrically dividing (frog) embryonic stem cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taner Arslan *Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2388-1811
Yanbo Pan *Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9442-7782
Georgios MermelekasDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden.
Mattias VesterlundDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9471-6592
Lukas M OrreDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden. lukas.orre@ki.se.
Janne LehtiöDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden. janne.lehtio@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-8100-9562
Science for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular functions of a protein are defined by its inherent properties in relation to its environment and interaction network. Within a cell, this environment and network are defined by the subcellular location of the protein. Consequently, it is crucial to know the localization of a protein to fully understand its functions. Recently, we have developed a mass spectrometry- (MS) and bioinformatics-based pipeline to generate a proteome-wide resource for protein subcellular localization across multiple human cancer cell lines ( www.subcellbarcode.org ). Here, we present a detailed wet-lab protocol spanning from subcellular fractionation to MS-sample preparation and analysis. A key feature of this protocol is that it includes all generated cell fractions without discarding any material during the fractionation process. We also describe the subsequent quantitative MS-data analysis, machine learning-based classification, differential localization analysis and visualization of the output. For broad applicability, we evaluated the pipeline by using MS data generated by two different peptide pre-fractionation approaches, namely high-resolution isoelectric focusing and high-pH reverse-phase fractionation, as well as direct analysis without pre-fractionation by using long-gradient liquid chromatography-MS. Moreover, an R package covering the dry-lab part of the method was developed and made available through Bioconductor. The method is straightforward and robust, and the entire protocol, from cell harvest to classification output, can be performed within 1-2 weeks. The protocol enables accurate classification of proteins to 15 compartments and 4 neighborhoods, visualization of the output data and differential localization analysis including treatment-induced protein relocalization, condition-dependent localization or cell type-specific localization. The SubCellBarCode package is freely available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/SubCellBarCode.html .

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsChromatography, LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryWorkflowProteome

Identifiers

PMID35732783
OpenAlexW4283267869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.