Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732746›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

Affinity-based isolation of extracellular vesicles and the effects on downstream molecular analysis.

Gisela Ströhle, Jingxuan Gan, Huiyan Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gisela StröhleSchool of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G2W1, Canada.
Jingxuan GanSchool of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G2W1, Canada.
Huiyan LiSchool of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G2W1, Canada. huiyanli@uoguelph.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are transport vesicles with diameters ranging from 30 to 1000 nm, secreted by cells in both physiological and pathological conditions. By using the EV shuttling system, biomolecular cargo such as proteins and genetic materials travels between cells resulting in intercellular communication and epigenetic regulation. Because the presence of EVs and cargo molecules in body fluids can predict the state of the parental cells, EV isolation techniques from complex biofluids have been developed. Further exploration of EVs through downstream molecular analysis depends heavily on those isolation technologies. Methodologies based either on physical separation or on affinity binding have been used to isolate EVs. Affinity-based methods for EV isolation are known to produce highly specific and efficient isolation results. However, so far, there is a lack of literature summarizing these methods and their effects on downstream EV molecular analysis. In the present work, we reviewed recent efforts on developing affinity-based methods for the isolation of EVs, with an emphasis on comparing their effects on downstream analysis of EV molecular cargo. Antibody-based isolation techniques produce highly pure EVs, but the harsh eluents damage the EV structure, and some antibodies stay bound to the EVs after elution. Aptamer-based methods use relatively mild elution conditions and release EVs in their native form, but their isolation efficiencies need to be improved. The membrane affinity-based method and other affinity-based methods based on the properties of the EV lipid bilayer also isolate intact EVs, but they can also result in contaminants. From the perspective of affinity-based methods, we investigated the influence of the isolation methods of choice on downstream EV molecular analysis.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesLipid BilayersBiological TransportEpigenesis, GeneticProteinsLipid BilayersProteinsAntibody-basedAptamer-basedDownstream molecular analysisExtracellular vesicles (EVs)IsolationMembrane affinity-based

Identifiers

PMID35732746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.