Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732678›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Top-down control of planktonic ciliates by microcrustacean predators is stronger in lakes than in the ocean.

Xiaoteng Lu, Thomas Weisse

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predation of Cyclopoid Copepods on the Theronts ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoteng LuResearch Department for Limnology, University of Innsbruck, Mondseestr. 9, 5310, Mondsee, Austria.
Thomas WeisseResearch Department for Limnology, University of Innsbruck, Mondseestr. 9, 5310, Mondsee, Austria. thomas.weisse@uibk.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-6558

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 32714Austrian Science Fund FWF P32714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planktonic ciliates are major components of pelagic food webs in both marine and freshwaters. Their population dynamics are controlled 'bottom-up' by prey availability and 'top-down' by microcrustacean predators. In oceans, copepods are the main ciliate predators while in lakes cladocerans are the typical predators. The efficacy by which these functionally different predators control ciliate population dynamics is debated. We, therefore, investigated experimentally the grazing of three microcrustacean predators with different feeding modes on five freshwater ciliates. We then performed a meta-analysis to assess if our findings can be generalised for aquatic ecosystems. We hypothesized that top-down control is stronger in lakes than in the ocean. We find that: (i) average ingestion rates of marine and freshwater microcrustaceans do not differ; (ii) clearance rates of freshwater cladocerans decrease with ciliate size but increase with ciliate size in freshwater copepods; (iii) clearance rates of the marine microcrustaceans is unrelated to ciliate cell size. These findings have implications for the functioning of freshwater and marine food webs: (i) the ciliate-microcrustacean link is stronger in lakes than in the ocean, and (ii) globally top-down control of ciliates is unlikely in the ocean.

Indexed as

CiliophoraCopepodaAnimalsEcosystemLakesOceans and SeasPlankton

Identifiers

PMID35732678
PMCPMC9218117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.