Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732645›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

High-resolution mass measurements of single budding yeast reveal linear growth segments.

Andreas P Cuny, K Tanuj Sapra, David Martinez-Martin, Gotthold Fläschner, Jonathan D Adams, Sascha Martin, Christoph Gerber, Fabian Rudolf, Daniel J Müller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wearable solar fluidic system.Science advances · 2025
    Article
  4. Chitin estimation in agricultural soils.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas P Cuny *Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9640-4154
K Tanuj Sapra *Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
David Martinez-Martin *Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. david.martinezmartin@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-9393
Gotthold Fläschner *Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-6905
Jonathan D AdamsEidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Sascha MartinUniversity of Basel, Department of Physics, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph GerberUniversity of Basel, Swiss Nanoscience Institute (SNI), 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Fabian RudolfEidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. fabianrudolf@icloud.com.
Daniel J MüllerEidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. daniel.mueller@bsse.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3075-0665
Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of cell growth has fundamental physiological, biotechnological and medical implications. However, methods that can continuously monitor individual cells at sufficient mass and time resolution hardly exist. Particularly, detecting the mass of individual microbial cells, which are much smaller than mammalian cells, remains challenging. Here, we modify a previously described cell balance ('picobalance') to monitor the proliferation of single cells of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, under culture conditions in real time. Combined with optical microscopy to monitor the yeast morphology and cell cycle phase, the picobalance approaches a total mass resolution of 0.45 pg. Our results show that single budding yeast cells (S/G2/M phase) increase total mass in multiple linear segments sequentially, switching their growth rates. The growth rates weakly correlate with the cell mass of the growth segments, and the duration of each growth segment correlates negatively with cell mass. We envision that our technology will be useful for direct, accurate monitoring of the growth of single cells throughout their cycle.

Indexed as

SaccharomycetalesAnimalsCell CycleCell DivisionG2 PhaseMammalsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID35732645
PMCPMC9217925
OpenAlexW4283373349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.