Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35732443›Full record

ArticleIndustrial health2023

Teleworking during COVID-19: experiences from Saudi Arabia.

Sama'a H Almubarak, Atheer Kalid Alsaif, Salma Jamal Almulla, Asma Saud Alfayez, Heba Yaagoub Alnujaidi, Demah Mansour Alsalman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sama'a H AlmubarakCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Atheer Kalid AlsaifCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Salma Jamal AlmullaCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Asma Saud AlfayezCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Heba Yaagoub AlnujaidiCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Demah Mansour AlsalmanCollege of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teleworking has been adopted as a response to COVID-19 to reduce the spread of the infection, while continuing business operations. Saudi Arabia was among the countries that adopted stringent teleworking policies accompanying the first documented COVID-19 case. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted to explore experiences of employees towards teleworking as a mandated work setting during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. We collected data using a questionnaire that was disseminated via different social media platforms during the partial curfew in the Country. The study sample included 471 participants. Most participants (78%) were satisfied with teleworking and reported higher job efficiency (44%) and work concentration (48%), and better work-life balance (56%) and stress management (55%). The positive experience was dependent on factors, such as gender, age, marital status, educational level, working sector and teleworking mode. Men, bachelor's degree holders, nonmarried, and employees working in health and education sectors as well as working flexible hours had less positive experience than their respective counterparts. The research contributes to literature about teleworking as a legitimate alternative work arrangement, while approaching teleworking as a means to reduce risks. As the first study conducted within Saudi Arabia, the study's findings have implications for policy, practice and research.

Indexed as

COVID-19CommerceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaTeleworkingCOVID-19ExperiencesFlexible work styleSaudi ArabiaTeleworking

Identifiers

PMID35732443
PMCPMC10398172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.